Horror Remakes Make Money without Quality

Remakes of The Scary Movie Genre Get Away with Murder

Mar 14, 2009 Juan Sagarbarria

Over the past few years, remakes of horror films have not only become common - but almost expected.

With classic titles being recreated in the past decade such as House on Haunted Hill, The Grudge, The Hills Have Eyes, Halloween, Prom Night and its newest addition Friday the 13th Hollywood producers manage to cause a stir in teenagers and die-hard-horror-movie fans to get them to the theatre but fail to impress them.

Why are horror classics being remade?

Money - The stats say it all. A couple of weeks topping the box office and we’re in business. People love a good scare and they’ll pay full-admission price to get it – or get it mildly.

At least that’s the case with New Line Cinema’s Friday the 13th remake, which, according to IMDB, set the highest record for a single-day take for an R-rated horror firm that day it opened – ironically, on Friday, Feb. 13th. It topped the box office making over $43 million in that first weekend – then plummeted.

Natalie Dunkin, Miami-resident and long-time fan of the 1980 original slasher film, was less than overwhelmed about the movie itself.

“It wasn’t scary - like most horror movies today aren’t,” she said. “They just make them real gory and you will occasionally jump out of your seat, but it wasn’t like when I saw the original which kept me up for days.”

Jason Voorhees, Michael Myers, Freddy Krueger… these legendary figures of the horror genre are being immortalized on a regular basis. It seems that nothing can kill them. According to Screenrant.com, a box-office hit will usually be the go-sign for terrible horror sequels.

The curse of horror flicks

Frankly, horror movies – with the exception of one or two such as 1992’s Silence of the Lambs – are not really Oscar material, yet they are appreciated to a strong degree by their fans.

Now, even the most adamant horror fans are starting to lose faith in the producers of these flicks because “it’s all been done before”.

“I don’t think horror movies are as impactful anymore; people don’t get scared as easily,” says Jonathan Leventhal, a Vancouver film student says. “Times have changed – people growing up with TV, video games, the media… they’ve seen more stuff than in 1975.”

It is fans like Dunkin and Leventhal who are disappointed with these new-age do-over’s of horror classics because they tend to emphasize a more visual - as opposed to a psychological scare.

“It’s all about blood and guts and body parts everywhere,” says Florida native Carlos Ravelo, another horror fan, “Whatever happened to the good old ‘whoa, that movie was something else’ – it’s just not there anymore.”

Ravelo also says that he usually goes to the movie with an open mind and generally walks out with the same feeling of disappointment.

So what is it that keeps teenagers from all walks of life motivated to fill seats at the movie theaters? These might be some of the reasons

  • People like getting scared.
  • The promise of something new and fresh.
  • It's just another reason to go to the movies when Oscar-bound movies are not out.

The next chapter

Granted, Hollywood knows what makes kids tick and the real reason behind it all. As reported by Screen Rant, writers are already brainstorming ideas for the next Friday the 13th and Halloween series. For the sake of all horror fans out there, let’s hope that they’ve learned from their past mistakes and come up with something different when reviving these timeless classics.

The copyright of the article Horror Remakes Make Money without Quality in Horror Films is owned by Juan Sagarbarria. Permission to republish Horror Remakes Make Money without Quality in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
What do you think about this article?

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
post your comment
What is 2+5?

Comments

Mar 28, 2009 8:40 AM
Guest :
I completely agree... I keep going back to see these horror remakes thinking they'll be as good as the first, but they always disappoint! I don't know what makes me keep going!!
Mar 29, 2009 9:57 AM
Guest :
These days, television seems to be surpassing movies in terms of viewer satisfaction. The writers of shows like LOST are, in my opinion, a whole lot more inventive than movie writers. Why pay $10 to see a movie when you can watch something better in the privacy of your own home?
Apr 1, 2009 10:50 AM
Guest :
I'm not a big fan of horror movies, but I totally agree with Juan that remakes are always about money...great article!
Apr 1, 2009 10:56 AM
Guest :
I agree with the autor - very well written. A Gomez
Apr 1, 2009 1:48 PM
Guest :
I completely agree with Juan! The quality is just not there! I don't even go watch the horror films anymore. I wait until they come out on DVD and get it through NetFlix or borrow it from a friend. Maybe some of these writers should take some psychology classes in order to make some real good psychological thrillers!! Alfred Hitchock anyone?!
Apr 1, 2009 6:54 PM
Guest :
This is so true...Juan has an excellent point. Great article!
Apr 1, 2009 10:11 PM
Guest :
It is true and without a doubt that “Silence of the Lambs” was the last good example of a terror movie. Scaring people should not be about blood and body parts but about putting the viewer in the middle of the plot making him part of the movie itself.
A movie should be about keeping the eyes on the screen not about having to look away due to a repulsive scene. As Juan mentions in his article “let us hope that Hollywood learns from his mistakes” and I add: and stop milking the classics !!!!! . G.D.
Apr 2, 2009 7:39 AM
Guest :
Good stuff...
Nice article
8 Comments