Paranormal Activity Film Review

Heavily Hyped Horror A Triumph of Marketing, Not Macabre Masterpiece

© Nick Rogers

Oct 23, 2009
Micah Sloat in Paranormal Activity, Dale Robinette
With tension deadened by depressing sensory cues for scares, "Paranormal Activity" might be the best-marketed horror movie ever made. But it's so far from the scariest.

Overhyped, underwhelming and without one memorable scare, Paranormal Activity is to be admired for its minimalist marketing might, not maximum rampaging fright.

All the dithering about Oren Peli’s film makes it sound primed to yank off your psyche’s carpet and plow through its floorboards with a jackhammer. But it’s using toy tools at best.

Katie Featherstone, Micah Sloat Star As Terrorized Couple in Paranormal Activity

Paranormal Activity boasts a great premise (a couple chronicling an increasingly nasty haunting of its home on digital equipment), actors as normal in appearance as folks in the audience (Micah Sloat like a dance-club rat and Katie Featherstone like an even plainer Jenna Fischer) and a few chills from audio-playback sequences.

Mostly, though, any of the bits that Paranormal Activity uses are more shopworn than its hype and huzzahs would have you believe. The only thing really drilled into your head is how woefully deficient the film is of any devious surprises.

Paranormal Activity Doesn't Abide By What Works in Horror-Movie Psychology and Suffers For It

The startle reflex is part of the horror-movie psychology. Sure, an audience might anticipate that something’s coming, but there’s a lot of information to sift through: Is something there? If so, what is it? Is it dead? Is it bad? What will it do?

Paranormal Activity’s problem is answering each question for us with telegraphed plot points and a pair of sensory cues that pop any balloon of tension or terror.

Katie (Featherstone) already knows a demon is after her – admitting that she’s been supernaturally stalked since she was 8 years old. As aggressively antagonistic boyfriend Micah (Sloat) suggests, that detail would have been nice to know before she moved in. (It’s just one of Paranormal Activity’s sillier plot gambits, which includes the only demonologist in California being “out of town” when called upon.)

Plus, whenever a digital timecode on the couple’s camera – most often mounted in their bedroom – speeds up, you know nothing will happen. Once it slows, you’re just waiting for spookiness to strike.

Also not helping is a loud bass rumble resembling construction equipment preceding any of the demon’s shenanigans. All of this feels less like mood, more like a Pavlovian trigger to get teens to stop Tweeting or texting and face the screen.

Good horror movies command a surplus of attention in their audience. This one sadly caters to its deficit, and when the demon strikes even in daylight, there’s no strong sense of fraying sanity. And that the duo even finds a way to fall asleep – let alone stay asleep – after more than two consecutive weeks of woe is a ludicrous notion.

It's Nice That Steven Spielberg Wanted To Help, But He Should Have Kept His Mouth Shut

Allegedly, the rattling on the soundtrack is the brainchild of Steven Spielberg, who claimed to be so scared by the film that he had to turn it off. Supposedly, he’s also responsible for the film’s current ending. (Given that there are arguably four money shots in the whole thing, why include the biggest one in a trailer with little footage?)

When giants like Spielberg speak, it’s not unexpected that first-timers like Peli will listen. However, on this one, Spielberg should have shushed himself.

Those who do see Paranormal Activity are encouraged to read about the original ending – bound to end up on the Blu-ray release and shatter the film’s marketing artifice as a true story. One of them is far preferable to the tired demonic gymnastics routine grafted on.

By virtue of its cheap look, minuscule budget and trickster marketing campaign, Paranormal Activity has drawn comparisons to The Blair Witch Project. In its current state, it differs little from last year's Quarantine. “The scariest film of all time?” So ridiculously far from it.


The copyright of the article Paranormal Activity Film Review in Horror Films is owned by Nick Rogers. Permission to republish Paranormal Activity Film Review in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Micah Sloat in Paranormal Activity, Dale Robinette
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Oct 25, 2009 1:42 PM
Guest :
I completely agree with this review; strong premise, but there are some serious flaws in the execution.. The whole point is to make it as real and relatable as possible to the audience, but they lost me (as well as the pace) everytime the couple reverted to their daily 'well that was spooky! but hey we'll just see how it goes' attitude after a supposed night of terror.. Questionable chemistry (and thought processes) between the main characters aside, a movie like this makes a viewer ask 'what would I do?' and I can tell you that I certainly wouldn't be able to sleep at all, let alone on the same side of the bed, in the same room, or in the same house after such events. The fact that this couple is able to do so only because katie is kinda/sorta used to it, and because some random expert character says it won't help is all just too weak, especially after showing the laughable and over the top scenes of what happened to the 'previous victim'. I found myself waiting impatiently for each night scene, and for the most part ended up disappointed as well as irritated with the lackluster daytime reactions from the main characters upon the discovery of their collected evidence. I might as well have been watching that moment in the cheesiest horror film when the stupid girl runs up the stairs instead of out of the house - but then stretched out over 90 minutes.
Oct 25, 2009 4:35 PM
Guest :
I completely agree with this review; strong premise, but there are some serious flaws in the execution.. The whole point is to make it as real and relatable as possible to the audience, but they lost me (as well as the pace) everytime the couple reverted to their daily 'well that was spooky! but hey we'll just see how it goes' attitude after a supposed night of terror.. Questionable chemistry (and thought processes) between the main characters aside, a movie like this makes a viewer ask 'what would I do?' and I can tell you that I certainly wouldn't be able to sleep at all, let alone on the same side of the bed, in the same room, or in the same house after such events. The fact that this couple is able to do so only because katie is kinda/sorta used to it, and because some random expert character says it won't help is all just too weak, especially after showing the laughable and over the top scenes of what happened to the 'previous victim'. I found myself waiting impatiently for each night scene, and for the most part ended up disappointed as well as irritated with the lackluster daytime reactions from the main characters upon the discovery of their collected evidence. I might as well have been watching that moment in the cheesiest horror film when the stupid girl runs up the stairs instead of out of the house - but then stretched out over 90 minutes.
Oct 29, 2009 3:53 PM
Guest :
I agree too.
I went to watch this movie /dreading/ the next time I'd have to go to bed. I'm a complete wimp when it comes to anything scary. Even movies that aren't supposed to be scary scare me. I have a highly active imagination and I don't need to see gore to be scared either.
After seeing this movie, I can honestly say I'm ashamed to be human. This movie was so terrible and un-scary, I didn't just waste time.. I came out of it so disappointed with the hype people have been giving it that I literally felt embarrassed for mankind. I didn't even want to be a member of the same species as the people who thought this movie was scary.
I have never had that strong of a reaction to any movie. If a movie is bad I usually just shrug it off and laugh. This movie was so bad, and the hype people have given it is so high, I have honestly lost faith in humanity.
Oct 30, 2009 8:28 PM
Guest :
Anyone who watches this film THREE time - THEY are the sad pathetic ones! For a film produced for only $15,000 it hasnt done so bad!!!!
Give them a break, jeesh! The fact that people went out and paid to watch it, what more can i say!
Nov 1, 2009 3:22 AM
Guest :
The $15,000 argument doesn't follow. It's not the movie effects or the props that make the movie bomb, the presentation does. I mean, sleep, record "scary" stuff, wake up, respond to "scary" stuff, rinse, repeat until it ends? Playing sim games may be fun, but its only because you have the mouse and there's a fast forward button.
Nov 5, 2009 10:12 PM
Guest :
Couldn't disagree more. Just got back from seeing it. I thought it was a very scary flick. What you saw as "telegraphing" I saw as setting you up. You get so focused on the scene and any little thing in it that the least little noise or event triggers you off. Sounds to me like you somehow think horror is about teenage girls being slashed. Sorry, that is boring, this is not. An hour and a half of escalating dread.
6 Comments